PDF | The theoretical analysis of Japan’s liquidity trap is developed by I think it is clear from the highlighted sections that Krugman is arguing. Must-Read: One thing that I find very interesting about Paul Krugman’s analysis of the liquidity trap and fiscal policy back in is how very. But I gather that some readers are confused – haven’t I been arguing that monetary policy is ineffective in a liquidity trap? The brief answer is.
|Country:||Bosnia & Herzegovina|
|Published (Last):||16 December 2011|
|PDF File Size:||17.46 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.9 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Except that Brazil has had a social democratic government for most of the past 20 years. He therefore claimed that increases in the quantity of money, which the state could engineer by means of open market operations, were a sufficient answer to the high unemployment then prevailing.
But who paid for it? There has to be some systemic change towards new system. Observe that in the popular — i. The current Great Recession is the result of in the UK massive cronyism, the particular talent of New Labour; again the unwarranted expansion of money and credit; and massive central planning of the financial system following the FSMA which brought in the Failed FSA which precipitated massive misregulation and the consequential failures.
A common allegation is that banking is particularly unsatisfactory and needs far-reaching reform of some kind or other. A single exam board might seem a tidy solution, but further rationalisation of exams provision should be avoided. If the objective is killing large numbers of people.
Ragmouse Capitalism has failed the population!! Mr Krugman is plainly wrong, however, to conclude that higher fiscal deficits financed by QE would somehow get us out of this modern liquidity trap. Oh, and who took us to war, twice? That is my view.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
That means accepting massive capital haircuts and defaults like Argentina and Iceland, instead of 22 years of debt penury like Japan. Further research by Tim Congdon is available here. This second interpretation resembles the problem of being trapped in the Euro Zone, and willingly so, because the Euro is probably as much a fetish today as gold was then.
Congdon base should be 3 percent,and QE should be stopped?
Dear Tim, You are right that the financial system is very different from the one Lord Keynes was analysing. What a lot of cobblers. It is therefore at the bank level that a modern Keynesian would look for the liquidity trap. Citizens feel powerless and the desilusion grows bigger and bigger. There is the possibility, for the reasons discussed above, that, after the rate of interest has fallen to a certain level, liquidity-preference may become virtually absolute in the sense that almost everyone prefers cash to holding a debt which yields so low a rate of interest.
Thinking about the liquidity trap
A particularly complex argument of this sort was presented by Keynes in his General Theory. However, to suggest that people could have an unlimited demand for money hoarding money that supposedly leads to a liquidity trap, as popular thinking has it, would imply that no one would be exchanging goods. What is required in this case is not to generate more inflation but the exact opposite.
However, the Great Depression and the more recent Great Recession were major setbacks, which suggested that contemporary capitalism might be vulnerable to macro-economic instability.
That leads to an unacceptably high real interest rate if people are concerned about falling prices. For instance, if for some reason people have become less confident about the future, they will cut traap on their outlays and hoard more money.
EconPapers: Thinking About the Liquidity Trap
The liquidity trap comes from too much saving and the lack of spending, so it is held. Add email to start This excessive consumption relative to the production of consumer goods leads to a decline in the pool of real savings.
His books include Monetarism: Slight problem in three years when it all has to be refinanced from the real world. In his New York Times article of January 11,he wrote. Keynes wrote, There is the possibility, for the reasons discussed above, that, after the rate of interest has fallen thinkng a certain level, liquidity-preference may become virtually absolute in the sense that almost everyone prefers cash to holding a debt which yields so low a rate of interest.