INTRODUCCION A LA HISTORIA CONTEMPORANEA by GEOFFREY BARRACLOUGH and a great selection of similar Used, New and Collectible Books. Introduccion a la Historia Contemporanea (English, Spanish, Paperback) / Author : Geoffrey Barraclough ; ; History, Books. : Introduccion a la Historia Contemporanea (Spanish Edition) ( ) by Geoffrey Barraclough and a great selection of similar New.

Author: Mitaxe Mibei
Country: Iceland
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 22 November 2016
Pages: 75
PDF File Size: 11.48 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.2 Mb
ISBN: 817-5-65461-523-7
Downloads: 61885
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gugami

His contributions to this inquiry were distiqpished not so georfrey by their originality or their theoretical refinement as by their vigor and their radical manifestation in his own practice of history, Barraclough transformed himself from a medievalist into a contemporary world historian in a revolt against what he believed was the Eurocentrism of conventional history.

Format All Paperback Hardback.

Introducción a la historia contemporánea

Gsoffrey All In stock 9. In doing so, he also rejected established historicist assumptions and p d m in favor of the of natural sdence.

Factors in German History Geoffrey Barraclough. In the second place, current ideological conflicts have obscured the issue [ Hishoria and their audiences wae both members of a particular community and shared a common experhe, of which common sense was one expression and a mapr link enabling communication from one to the other.

Written inthe book feels slightly ahead of its time in emphasizing repeatedly that the future of “contemporary history” will not lie in Europe, but contemporaea the regions of the world that are home to the vast majority of the world’s population: It did not seek to barracllugh general laws of history nor to force the story of the human past into a single narrative mold.

Young reccmunended that when historians study men they should ask, ”What was happening in the world when he was twenty?

From Agadir to Armageddon Geoffrey Barraclough. He had been trained as a medievalist at oxfard and Mu- nich in the late s and early Os, and he quickly made his mark in English historical scholarship with published studies of the papacy and sulted a half-century later. Barraclough takes a skeptical stance towards reformulations of a European-centred historio This dry-sounding pelican book revealed to me a lot of very misleading ideas Barraclougj had, until finishing it, been labouring under.


See also Idem, “Historian in a Changhg World,” 7. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. The world he knew from his study of the past bore little relation to the world he encountered in the pnsent?

It is one of these books now 50 years old or sowhere one while reading it entertains the fantasy or hope that the author would have been alive today so as to write a more contemporary continuation to it. Introduccin a la Historia contemporneaby Geoffrey Barraclough Documents.

Like his Stevenson Lecture, his historical argu- ments were self-consciously combative. After universal franchise, an entire political tradition was not so much histodia as deserted, barracclough Barraclough’s view.

The spedfic content of this thesis, and its validity, are of less i n m t here, however, than the way in which it was argued.


Also intriguing overviews of the descent from peak imperialism at the end of the nineteenth century, into the steady break up of the old European empires. Contemporary historians must appmch their subject in the same way Tho years earlier, quoting Sir Isaiah Berlin, Barraclough had censured the moral relativism encouraged by historkist injunctions to study the inhroduccion on its own terms.

There are no discussion topics on this book yet.

If the new, global avilization needed a new, global view of the past, he thought that it needed meet of all an analysis of the contemporary ”nodal age in the unification of the world.

Hisoria rated it really bzrraclough it Dec 26, In reality, as M. They might have been appmpriate a hundred years earlier in a time of advance and security, but they had become deceptive and d a n p u s half-truths, at variance with the twentiethentury human experience.

Mediaeval Germany, Geoffrey Barraclough. Barraclough does not outright deny that revolutionary movements generally were the signs of this radically new contemporary age, however he is more likely to stress the aforementioned revolution intrduccion parliamentary democracy writ large.


In particular, the Soviet victory over the Germans at Stalingrad in the winter of forced on him a realization of the exceedingly narrow compass within which his own studies had prrxeeded.

SAMP | Vista de materia

Now, quoting Ekrlin again, he maintained that moral judgments did not advance historical under standing. He had acquired considerable knowledge of the papal chancery and of Hohenstaufens, I-Iohenzollm, and Habsburgs, while learning little of the Byzantine empire and nothing whatsoever of Piasts, Pmmyslids, and Ruriks.

The direct heir of Rome was actually Byzantium and, after the fall of Constan- tinople, Russia had laid claim to the Byzantine imperial and Christian inher- itance. Many were skeptical of systems building, but almost everyone abandoned positivist suspicions of theorization and generalization. It was reinforced also by new trends in the physical sciences and by the impact of new psychological insights.

Christian World Geoffrey Barraclough.

An Introduction to Contemporary History

Becoming Historical – Historical Yet the Slavophils did not so historla IE pudiate Europe as rebel against bourgeois rationalism and materialism. It is new because the politically active elements today no longer consist of a relatively small body of equals, all introfuccion secure and sharing the same social background, but are drawn from a vast amorphous society, comprising all levels of wealth and education, for the most part fully occupied with the business of earning a daily living, who can be mobilized for political action by the highly integrated political machines we call “parties.

These, he suggested, were concepts, and prohibition of them in theory meant hlstoria that intuition, analogy, metaphor, and mnvention substituted for rigorous methodology and critical reflection in their invention and use.