Get this from a library! Relecciones sobre los indios y el derecho de guerra. [ Francisco de Vitoria]. Relecciones sobre los indios y el derecho de guerra. Front Cover. Francisco de Vitoria. Espasa-Calpe Argentina, s.a. – Indians, Treatment of – pages. Né à Burgos (d’une mère d’ascendance juive), Francisco entre en au couvent Estudio crítico de introducción a sus Lecturas y Relecciones, Madrid, Vitoria, Francisco de, Sobre el poder civil, Sobre los Indios, Sobre el derecho de la.
|Published (Last):||21 November 2015|
|PDF File Size:||12.2 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.89 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Views Read Edit View history. Loz guerra giusta nella riflessione di Miguel de Arcos. He has in the past been described by some scholars as one of the “fathers of international law”, along with Alberico Gentili and Hugo Grotiusthough contemporary academics have suggested that such a description is anachronisticsince the concept of international law did not truly develop until much later.
Arcos’ thought can also be better understood thanks to his inedit Suma of Quiroga’s work. Kant himself displays a rhetoric of hospitality that does not grant a right to circulate but reaffirms sovereign power over boundaries. Remember me on this computer. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. If there is an empirical difference between a short and friendly visit and a long and invasive residence, the normative distinction is not entirely justified.
No trivia or quizzes yet. Because of Vitoria’s conception of a “republic of the whole world” res publica totius orbis he recently has been labeled “founder of global political philosophy”. It can be an injustice, but not serious enough to deserve a war or conquest as a proportional punishment.
Francisco De Vitoria
Still, Vitoria is called one of the founders of international law along with Alberico Gentili and Hugo Grotius. Vitoria was born c. Valdemar Gomes marked it as to-read Oct 31, This is particularly clear with Hugo Grotius and Samuel von Pufendorf. Francisco de Vitoria died on 12 August  in Salamanca. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. He has in the past been described by some scholars as the “father of international law”, though contemporary academics have suggested that such a description is anachronistic, since the concept of an “international law” did not truly develop until much later.
Want to Read saving…. To ignore these differences implies not only the exercise of anachronism, but also the simplification of their writings: Trivia About Relecciones Sobre Turning to the early modern philosophers of the School of Salamanca, Bohrer argues that In both cases, foreigners need to wait for the approval of the nation welcoming them.
Aquinas, Scotus, and Ockham. This stance also contrasts sharply with much modern and contemporary double effect theorizing in relation to jus in bello.
At the Origins of Modernity. It will first trace the reasons for saying that the intended aim of self-defence, being an evident moral principle, is self-preservation, which, however, often results in choosing means that harm or kill the aggressor.
Catalog Record: Reflectio de Indis : la questione degli Indios | Hathi Trust Digital Library
It discusses the connections between the challenges that the New World posed for XVIth century thinkers and those that we are currently facing, for example those related to the cyberworld.
James Millikan rated it really liked dee May 01, A teoria do Estado de Francisco de Vitoria: Francisco de Vitoria OP c.
This page was last edited on 17 Decemberat From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This section does not cite any sources. Jorge Salamanca marked it as to-read Aug 12, At first sight, the right of hospitality seems absolute or perfect. Francisco de Vitoria’s writings have been interpreted by various scholars to support contrary policies.
Francisco de Vitoria
Marina Schulz rated it liked it Mar 23, Chris marked it as to-read Nov 09, Through a careful reading of the work of Francisco de Vitoria, I explain how the creation of a ” color-blind ” system of universal human rights—specifically, the ” universal vtoria ” to travel and commerce— operated francisxo uphold systematic white and Euro supremacy through ” color-blind ” discourses. Refusing the entry of the Spaniards may be a just cause for a war.
Thus, killing innocents, although undesirable, can be justified on moral grounds. It will be argued that Vitoria can obviously not morally justify the death of innocents on the grounds of an aggression, and this calls into question the validity of his overall argument. A case that mirrors the arguments set forth in the discussion on self-defence is the killing of innocents in the course of a just war.
A supporter of the just war theoryin De iure belli Francisco pointed out that the underlying predicate conditions for a “just war” were “wholly lacking in the Indies”.