(formally Digital Fusion) is Eyeon’s flagship motion graphics and video compositing package, used in a variety of films that are currently in. FUSION? TUTORIAL BEGINNERS INTRODUCTION – YouTube. Fusion Camera Projection Tutorial – YouTube Simple Camera, Motion Design, Projects. Page 1 of 2 – Desired Tutorials From Eyeon – posted in Fusion: The video and tutorial from Marcus on the speed of Fusion was great!!!.
|Published (Last):||6 March 2016|
|PDF File Size:||19.63 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.18 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I’ve forgotten my password. That shows tutorialw knows what he’s doing. Another easy task would be to approach guys like the makers of “Mac and Cheese” see the other thread to show a quick setup and maybe share a comp with just a single frame of their main character.
Several functions may not work. However, Marcus is no doubt busy earning a living, and probably doesn’t have the time to do an in depth tutorial – and Most online and DVD courses seem to be done by bad compositors who can’t teach or who teach completely incorrect and inefficient workflows.
Posted 08 September – I know my request is a bit nebulous, but Shadows should ttuorials a tutorialss of geometry, not texture.
13 Fusion Tutorials Every Motion Designer Should Watch
The series covers everything you need to know to get started. It isn’t done the other way round because you just can’t reach the quality and productivity in Fusion.
New to Blackmagic Fusion? I’d like to make it a real-life situation by not going full CG I don’t have access to a 3D app anyways but using a filmed plate which means you’re stuck with what was shot on set and you’ll have to fix it in post – keying a miniature motion control shot of a submarine of course this will be a fake using an fbx and a green background.
The tutorials covered include the following topics in this order:.
But I have hatched a plan Notice how he paints the textures to make them look flat? Loading low-poly FBX models and shading them in Fusion isn’t quite how it’s done in real life.
A ‘feed back loop’ – where ideas go in – and even better ideas come out. Using light, reflections, shaders, shapes, FBX, text, etc. Here’s a higher-poly sub-divided FBX sequence rendered totally in Fusion with the software renderer can select p if viewed on YouTube.
If eyeon would offer them a subscription for a year they’d probably be more than happy to spend some days cleaning and prepping an example comp: Now look at this one, done by an “instructor” skip to 6: I guess I just don’t see why we bifurcate tasks between a 3D app and a compositor, when having more 3D app features in Fusion but certainly not modelingwould seem to be an advantage? If they don’t rely on special plugins you can transfer those windshield replacement, laser eyes or “rocket hits building” effects tutorials to Fusion.
There’s often better stuff for free on YouTube or Vimeo though it’s more fragmented. But from that point on it will be tutorlals as a filmed plate, so no relying on that fbx model in the process. You’re obviously way ahead of me in terms of Fusion and 3D graphics, but In fact, a lot of things he did in that video gave me ideas.
If you have a clue about texturing, this will make you cringe. If we had to use a 3rd party tool like Renderman to render, why not go that way, so that Eyeon didn’t waste their time re-inventing the wheel – adding costs for those who don’t want it.
I wanna buy stuff as well: In this tutorial from Kert Gartnerwe take a look at the cinematic potential of Fusion.
More articles from this Author. While it does cost money to subscribe, they currently have nine different courses that cover the basics of Fusion. This gives you further control when you jump into your compositing software like After Effects or Fusion. But, my guess is that most features that got added as far as rendering would find eager users?
I rewinded twice because I thought I had misunderstood. You can always get help here if you’re stuck.
Tutorials for Eyeon Fusion (Particles, Tracking, Keying, Match Moving)