Exercise modified (E. Czarny, E. Nojszewska, Mikroekonomia – zbiór zadań). The utility function of Barnaba is given as follows: U(x,y) = 8xy additional workouts in Polish: Czarny, E., E. Nojszewska, , ” Mikroekonomia: zbiór zadań”, PWE. additional workouts in Polish: Laidler, D. additional workouts in Polish: Czarny, E., E. Nojszewska, , ” Mikroekonomia: zbiór zadań”, PWE. additional workouts in Polish: Laidler, D., S. Estrin,

Author: Gotilar Yozshuk
Country: Portugal
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 10 September 2015
Pages: 309
PDF File Size: 15.98 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.53 Mb
ISBN: 730-8-16736-393-6
Downloads: 22487
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Bakasa

Business lobbying for administrative barriers is called rent seeking. A Modern Approach”, 6th ed. Clearly, this is oligopolistic competition consisting of interdependent price adjustments among competitors. Hovenkamp, Federal Antitrust Policy. Principle and Execution, Harvardp.

If asked to solve a problem at the board by the instructor, you do not receive any points. Included in writing during and at the end of the semester.

The reduction of the number of companies in a particular market may lead to anti-competitive agreements, but not necessarily. Obligatory reading – chapters from: In the retake exam period in March there will be only one final test organized, taking the same form as the normal final test.

The UOKiK finds information necessary to establish a restriction of competition associated with fixing minimum fees for services provided by members of professional associations in draft statutes or nojszrwska adopted by-laws of such associations as they contain provisions contradictory nojzewska Article 6 1 1 of the Act of If these criteria are not fulfilled, the cartel lacks discipline nojszewsma the application of the fixed prices, which might reduce it to price lists only that are generally mkiroekonomia the public domain.

A digressive penalty scheme encourages cartel members to file leniency notices. Market transparency and cartels Collusion among competitors may not only apply to price fixing, production quotas or market sharing.

Economic Approach to Counteracting Cartels

It will be organized only once. All participants of the course are allowed to take the nojszeqska test, regardless of the result from the first approach. An agreement between competitors operating in a particular market may effectively close that market for potential competition, enabling parties to mkroekonomia agreement to apply monopolistic practices and achieve profits thereof.

This paradigm, also known to organisation and management theory, leads to the conclusion that companies operate within the limits set by market structure Hovenkamp, The Antitrust Enterprise…, p.


In a situation when an agreement did not affect the market, because it lacked discipline in observing its terms and sanctions for its breach or due to other conditions unfavourable to the execution of the agreement, then according to the law such a cartel has to be prohibited by the UOKiK but with a possibility of a substantial reduction of the usual fines they should be merely symbolic.

Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New Yorkp.

Microeconomics – University of Łódź

They are considered to be negative because the achievement of such business goals may restrict competition and go against social interests7. Information about fuel prices at gas stations is public and displayed on pylons easily seen from a distance. For instance, if a company using its dominant position in a relevant market increases its prices above the level found in a competitive market, then the high level of monopolistic yield encourages market entry by potential competitors.

However, approaching the retake test cancels the result obtained from the first approach. For example, Herbert Hovenkamp states that the application of competition law is necessary if administrative intervention into market processes is economically justified9. In the latter case, kikroekonomia law shall not be applicable because, even though its market effects may seem similar to those of an overt collusion, entrepreneurs have neither met nor agreed upon their actions Establishing the existence of cartel facilitating factors is considered to be the purpose of the relevant market analysis which requires the economic approach to determine: While the effects nojszeweka such parallelism may indeed be similar to those associated with agreements between competitors, however the mechanism of obtaining those results is different.

Menu edit Modules Micro 1 Micro 2 Micro 3. Criteria and consequences of effectiveness of cartels VI. Partial and final results incl. The explanation of this phenomenon may be found in the concept of co-opetition, according to which entrepreneurs are willing and should co-operate in the process of added value creation, while they should compete in the process of added value distribution in the relevant market You are not logged in log in.

It was analysed by the UOKiK in its explanatory proceedings concerning fuel prices at local gas stations28 discontinued in the end, nkjszewska the uniformization retail prices was found to be the result of parallel actions of gas station owners or price following.


Economic Notes and Other Materials. In their opinion, the market is able to self-adjust its deviations to the normal status of competitive equilibrium. Enterprises in the market and motives of their activities 6. In reality, a conflict njszewska business goals and competition law principles is often apparent.

Microeconomics – Main/A

Particularly important is the examination of price change predictions and an analysis whether actual prices result from the actions of competitors or from adjustment to the conduct of the price leader. Theory and Practice, Cambridge His model was further developed by Heinrich von Stackelberg who presumed that one of the mikoekonomia of the duopoly knew that its competitor was following the principles of the Cournot model. The balance of the company with a full monopoly 8. First, price-fixing is effective when: The economic theory, used by the economics of competition law, has at its disposal many concepts and instruments for the evaluation of market effects of an identified collusion or for excluding the existence of such an agreement on a given relevant market.

The need for an economization of antitrust proceedings, including anti-cartel czarnu, pointed out in the economics of competition law, should modify the current approach applied to cartels.

This justifies the implementation of particularly severe restrictions against agreements between competitors aimed at price fixing, setting production and sales quotas, sharing markets, setting other terms of trade or the exchange of sensitive information Which methods make it possible to differentiate cartels from competition in oligopolistic markets including economic and econometric analyses?

Summary Prices convergence on a market for goods traded by various producers, concentration of their basic product quotas in a particular territory and relative stability of their market shares — do not always have to indicate the existence of an agreement between the players on that market. If the analysis of pricing policy and of the optimization of distributional logistics indicates that it was impossible to establish the existence of a cartel regulating these areas, then the presumption on fixing production quotas would be illogical.