This standard is issued under the fixed designation D ; the number 1 This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D on Rubber. ASTM D Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—International Hardness. Buy ASTM D – 18 Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—International Hardness from SAI Global.
|Published (Last):||7 September 2008|
|PDF File Size:||3.39 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard Translated Version s: For such compounds, differences in the dwell time in the two hardness tests Test Methods D and D result in differences in hardness values. Material 1 and Material 2 should be asttm same. This curve is defined as follows:.
ASTM D vs. D Type M micro-hardness testing – Rubber engineering – Eng-Tips
Defense manufacturing is all about project manufacturing and project accounting. In my experience, admittedly with the normal test, the difference ought not to exceed 5 units or so even when we recognise the underlying difference in durometer and International Rubber Hardness tests. D Type M astn testing 3.
By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. I’m new to the rubber scene so any help is appreciated! It is easy to find on the web.
It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
I think it depends on what what specification or requirements you’re trying to zstm, or what the customer wants.
Readings may not be comparable when testing curved or irregularly shaped test specimens. Could anyone better explain the differences between the two? D Type M micro-hardness testing First off, thank you for your input!
D Type M micro-hardness testing Thanks Tom for the insight! The differential penetration is taken at a specified time and converted to a hardness scale value.
Resources Digital Transformation may be defined in a number of different ways by analysts or enterprise software vendors. Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is aetm.
Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard. Material is NBR rubber.
Are the results even comparable in the same scale? If something is amiss I think it may well be with the quality of the D test RE: Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.
Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard. It’s easy to join and it’s free.
Thanks Again Pat RE: Posting Guidelines Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden. The tip of the indentor takes some time to settle into the depression it makes, eg overcoming drag forces – which one reason for the application of a solid lubricant, usually talc.
In this case which test should one believe? I think it’s like tear strength; there are several different test methods e.
IRHD Micro Hardness Tester, ISO 48, ASTM D
Something I should have included before: Are you an Engineering professional? D Type M micro-hardness testing Hi, Pat. This curve is defined as follows: Join your peers on the Internet’s largest technical engineering professional community.
The hardness is obtained by the difference in penetration depth of a specified dimension ball under two conditions of contact with the rubber: I have had some O-rings tested at two different labs. Cobbold Both H W Wallace.