Arthur C. Custance. · Rating details · 6 ratings · 1 review. Considered a classic in Christian apologetics, this scholarly analysis of the Biblical phrase ” without. Without Form and Void by Arthur C. Custance, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. “Without Form And Void: A Study of the Meaning of Genesis ” by – Arthur C. Custance – ISBN: , Classic Reprint Press.

Author: JoJozragore Mujin
Country: Turkey
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 17 July 2006
Pages: 213
PDF File Size: 18.76 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.76 Mb
ISBN: 666-5-77582-344-5
Downloads: 78206
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dajind

I only said that since the two verses stand in. They had no knowledge of working evil or wickedness, but.

Without Form and Void: A Study of the Meaning of Genesis 1:2

And it will show that it is indeed a long-held view. But whether the earth’s “state of alien- ation” from God as Caedmon evidently views Gen. Neither should we allow Scripture firm determine what the scientist observes in the laboratory. Rocholl who proposed some questions to him, and.

Opponents object to this ‘Gap Theory’ c.custancf simply an attempt to ‘rescue’ modern Geology. Abstract Table of Contents.

Verse 2 may be the. It has been alleged. Had Moses’ object been merely to ex. It is well to remember that a substantial number of other Hebrew.

Goosegirl marked it as to-read Jan 13, In he wrote: Pusey, Oxford Professor of Hebrew, diedor in one of its views for example, Franz Delitzsch, German Hebraist, diedwho held to the second view but not the first.

Yet, for some strange reason, it is still identified by many modern writers as a recent invention, without linguistic or exegetical support in Scripture, and never favoured by any scholar with a reputation! Chris Reighley added it May 14, Verse 2 may be the record of a situation which not merely arose only some time after the initial creation, but a situation which may also have persisted for some time after it arose.


Targum of Onkelos, the earliest of the Aramaic Versions of the Old. As to his view of the events of the first creation, he wrote: Thus he wrote subsequently: I did not say that this mode of speech impels us to the meaning of a vast gap – perhaps ages in length – between the first verse and the second.

Nor, indeed, do I judge those basic components of earth and water, which I have taught originated first of all, to have been fabricated the same day on which had occurred the appearance of day light, as it pleases certain persons to believebut by no means with sound enough reason.

Those who held it referred to it and built up arguments upon it without apparently feeling the need to apologize for believing as they did, nor for ex- plaining the grounds for their faith. Just how far back can one trace this now rather unpopular view and how explicit are the earlier references?

Without Form and Void – Frontpage

He repeats this three pages later: Some Pagan Traditions of a C.cuwtance Catastrophe. Another claim is that the Gap Theory is recent. This shows us that after the captivity God will again enlighten us, and send us the Messiah The Mosaic history of creation. This man was an unusually gifted individual and it was largely due to wkthout enthusiastic co-operation with Dunstan, the then Archbishop of Canterbury, that Monasticism was revived in England.


However, in his History of the Wifhout Covenantpublished inhe committed himself more fully. The force of this was fully re. In short, Young’s picture is that we have a self-contained and.

But the ‘heavenly seats’ of these rebellious creatures were now vacant. Geology challenged the Mosaic chronology, and subsequently explored.

Ahmad Diyargard marked it as to-read Oct 28, I believe, moreover, that there may be one further evidence in. Aramaic Versions, reflected perhaps by Paul in his letter to the. This is supposed to have solved the problem of time by an expeditious interpretation previously unrecognized. The Use of Hayah without the Lamedh Following.

Without Form and Void : A Study of the Meaning of Genesis 1.2

There is nothing in the sacred narrative forbidding. At any rate, it seems to have anv sufficiently broadly recognized to influence Alcuin in his edition of The Book of Jasher which although it may very well be a forgery was at least issued somewhere towards the end of the 18th century.

The most famous of these early protagonists in England was per- haps Dr. Delitzsch now believed that the cause of the judgment forrm that the “Prince of the Angels would not continue in the truth and therefore the earth was consumed”. He affirms, indeed, that it was created, and that it. It was not a matter of indifference to Dillman, therefore, but of.